Mediation brief · The ZECsy Grant and Community Conduct
How should the Zcash community address the ZECsy grant and related discussions, particularly concerning inclusivity and the use of public funds?
Sources: forum.zcashcommunity.com · 8 replies · Analyzed Oct 29, 2026, 9:31 PM UTC
Position A
Prioritize Inclusivity and Condemn Hate
- The broader crypto community and Zcash leaders have been silent on transphobia and antisemitism following ZECsy booth photos.
- Debates about ZCG funding are healthy, but attacking community members for their identity is unacceptable.
- Financial privacy protects vulnerable people, including those in the adult industry, making inclusivity essential for Zcash's mission.
- The Zcash community needs more empathy, and some negativity may come from those wishing privacy to fail.
- Many Zcash leaders on X (Twitter) are not speaking out against hate.
- Grouping sex work with extreme crimes is an example of hate.
Fairness check from this side's view: 9 / 10
Position B
Ensure Responsible Use of Public Funds and Acknowledge Free Speech
- People are free to say what they want, and not all critics are Zcashers.
- No Zcash leader has specifically criticized ZECsy for being trans or mentioned antisemitism.
- It is inappropriate to use public funds for sex worker and adult content conferences due to their controversial nature.
- Zcash's strength is its refusal to promote dark market usage, making it more accessible.
Fairness check from this side's view: 9 / 10
Position C
Support Active and Open Community Representation
- Many Zcash community members use pseudonyms, but some are willing to openly represent Zcash.
- The ZECsy team is respected for their active and open interaction with people.
Fairness check from this side's view: 9 / 10
Common ground
Facts, checked by the swarm
5 factual claims were not checked. The run stops at 8.
| Claim | Said by | Swarm check | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Consistent · 100% | ||
| A | Not checkable as stated | The panel split evenly, so there is no settled side. | |
| C | Consistent · 100% | ||
| C | Consistent · 80% | ||
| C | Not checked | Not checked in this run. The budget stops at four factual claims. | |
| B | Not checked | Not checked in this run. The budget stops at four factual claims. | |
| B | Not checked | Not checked in this run. The budget stops at four factual claims. | |
| A | Not checked | Not checked in this run. The budget stops at four factual claims. | |
| A | Not checked | Not checked in this run. The budget stops at four factual claims. |
Where they really disagree
1. Defining 'Hate' and Acceptable Discourse
2. Role of Zcash Leaders in Condemning Hate
3. Appropriate Use of Public Funds for Marketing
Options
Issue a Strong Statement on Inclusivity
Zcash leaders should issue a clear, public statement condemning transphobia, antisemitism, and any form of hate, reaffirming Zcash's commitment to inclusivity and financial privacy for all, including marginalized communities.
Review Grant Funding Guidelines for Controversial Markets
The ZCG should review and clarify its grant funding guidelines regarding engagement with controversial markets, ensuring that public funds are used in a way that maintains broad community support and avoids association with illicit activities.
Support Open Community Representatives
The Zcash community should actively support and encourage individuals who are willing to openly represent Zcash and engage with diverse groups, recognizing their value in broader adoption efforts.
Facilitate Dialogue on Inclusivity and Funding
Organize a moderated community forum or discussion specifically to address the tension between promoting inclusivity for all users and ensuring responsible use of public funds, seeking to find common ground and shared principles.
4 of 5 rank first
Develop a Community Code of Conduct
Establish a formal community code of conduct that outlines expectations for respectful discourse, defines unacceptable behavior (e.g., hate speech), and provides clear mechanisms for enforcement, applicable across all Zcash communication channels.
Swarm's suggested path
Facilitate Dialogue on Inclusivity and Funding has the highest minimum acceptability across the positions, at 69.
A suggestion for discussion, not a ruling. Verafy doesn't decide value questions; it shows where the disagreement is and which options each side can live with.
- 5 factual claims were not checked. The run stops at 4.
All sources (8)
- https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/we-can-disagree-about-grants-there-s-no-room-for-hate/58571/1
- https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/we-can-disagree-about-grants-there-s-no-room-for-hate/58571/2
- https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/we-can-disagree-about-grants-there-s-no-room-for-hate/58571/3
- https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/we-can-disagree-about-grants-there-s-no-room-for-hate/58571/4
- https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/we-can-disagree-about-grants-there-s-no-room-for-hate/58571/5
- https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/we-can-disagree-about-grants-there-s-no-room-for-hate/58571/6
- https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/we-can-disagree-about-grants-there-s-no-room-for-hate/58571/7
- https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/we-can-disagree-about-grants-there-s-no-room-for-hate/58571/8