How should coinholders evaluate proposals for the Q4 2026 Retroactive Grants Program?
Use the browser print dialog and choose Save as PDF.
Position A: Fund based on merit, not personal opinions
Fairness 9/10
- Coinholders should vote based on the merit of contributions.
- Valid contributions should not be rejected due to differing opinions.
Position B: Ensure transparent and verifiable governance
Fairness 9/10
- Retroactive grants fund work that is completed and publicly verifiable.
- The community provides feedback on proposals posted in the forum.
- It would be beneficial to know the number of human voters in coinholder polling.
The deadline for proposal submission is November 13th at 20:00 UTC.. Consistent · 100%
The polling/voting period is scheduled from December 17th to December 29th.. Consistent · 80%
Proposals must be submitted on GitHub and copied to the Zcash Community Forum.. Consistent · 100%
Vote solely on the merit of completed work has the highest minimum acceptability across the positions, at 66.
A suggestion for discussion, not a ruling. Verafy doesn't decide value questions; it shows where the disagreement is and which options each side can live with.